Portrait lighting

Nine lighting patterns, one face

Every guide to portrait lighting explains the patterns with a diagram and a different stock photograph for each. That makes them hard to compare, because you are looking at nine different people. These are all the same model, lit nine ways, from the same source photograph.

The source photograph

Everything below starts here. Nothing about the face changes between the nine; only where the light comes from and how hard it is.

The unmodified source photograph
Original

The nine patterns

Loop Lighting on the same model

Loop Lighting

How to spot it. A small shadow from the nose that loops down and outward toward the cheek, without touching the shadow on the far side of the face.

How it is made. One light, roughly 30 to 45 degrees off the camera axis and slightly above eye level. The most common portrait setup there is, and the default here for that reason.

Who it suits. Almost everyone. It adds enough shape to avoid looking flat while staying gentle enough not to dramatise a face that does not want dramatising. If you do not know which to pick, this is the one.

Split Lighting on the same model

Split Lighting

How to spot it. The face divided down the middle: one half lit, one half in shadow, with the transition running along the centre line.

How it is made. One light at 90 degrees to the subject, level with the face. Nothing filling the shadow side.

Who it suits. Faces with texture and structure worth showing, since skimming light across the surface emphasises both. It reads as serious and masculine by convention rather than by any rule, and it is unforgiving of anything you would rather not emphasise.

Butterfly Lighting on the same model

Butterfly Lighting

How to spot it. A small symmetrical shadow directly beneath the nose, shaped like a butterfly, with matching shadows under both cheekbones.

How it is made. One light directly above and in front, angled down at roughly 45 degrees. Often with a reflector below to open the shadows under the chin. Also called paramount lighting, after the studio that used it on everyone.

Who it suits. Beauty and glamour work, and it is genuinely flattering on older faces because the light falls from above and softens rather than carves. Narrow faces take it better than round ones.

Rembrandt Lighting on the same model

Rembrandt Lighting

How to spot it. An inverted triangle of light on the shadowed cheek, beneath the eye, no wider than the eye and no longer than the nose. If the triangle joins the lit side, it is not Rembrandt yet.

How it is made. One light around 45 degrees to the side and 45 degrees above, so the nose shadow reaches the cheek shadow and leaves that one patch of light isolated between them. Named after the painter, who used it constantly.

Who it suits. Anyone wanting depth and a little gravity. It is the most quoted portrait pattern in photography for a reason: one light, a reflector, and a result that looks considered.

Flat Lighting on the same model

Flat Lighting

How to spot it. Almost no visible shadow anywhere on the face, and no obvious direction to the light.

How it is made. Light from the camera position, or two matched sources either side. Deliberately shadowless.

Who it suits. Commercial and catalogue work where the job is to show something clearly rather than to interpret it. It minimises texture, which is useful for skin and unhelpful for structure.

Badger Lighting on the same model

Badger Lighting

How to spot it. Two hard sources crossing from opposite sides, leaving a strip of shadow down the centre of the face.

How it is made. Two lights at wide opposing angles, both hard, with nothing filling the middle. The inverse of the usual arrangement: shadow in the centre rather than at the edges.

Who it suits. Editorial and music work that wants to look deliberately constructed. It is the least conventional pattern in this set and the one that most obviously announces that a photographer made a decision.

Clamshell Lighting on the same model

Clamshell Lighting

How to spot it. Even, wraparound light with no hard shadow under the chin, and two matching catchlights in the eyes, one above and one below.

How it is made. A soft source above and in front, and a reflector or second source directly below, angled toward each other so the subject sits in the gap. The shape of the two surfaces is where the name comes from.

Who it suits. Beauty photography, cosmetics, and anything where skin should look smooth. The light from below is what removes the shadow under the jaw, which is most of what makes it flattering.

Rim Lighting on the same model

Rim Lighting

How to spot it. A bright outline along the edge of the hair and shoulders, separating the subject from the background, with the face itself relatively dark.

How it is made. A light behind the subject, out of frame, pointing back toward the camera. Usually added to another pattern rather than used alone.

Who it suits. Any portrait fighting a dark background, since the rim is what stops a dark-haired subject dissolving into it. It also reads as cinematic, because film uses it constantly for exactly that separation problem.

High Key Lighting on the same model

High Key Lighting

How to spot it. Bright throughout, a white or near-white background, and shadows that are present but very light. Not the same as overexposed.

How it is made. Soft light on the subject plus separate light on the background, brought up until it clips to white. The tonal range is deliberately compressed toward the top.

Who it suits. Clean, optimistic, commercial work: beauty, fitness, product-adjacent portraits, anything for a white page. It hides texture, which is sometimes the point and sometimes the cost.

Which one to pick

If you are choosing rather than studying: loop for almost anyone, Rembrandt when you want depth, butterfly for beauty work and older faces, clamshell when skin should look smooth, split when structure and texture are the point, high key for a white page, rim whenever a dark subject risks disappearing into a dark background. Flat and badger are deliberate choices rather than defaults, one for clarity and one for effect.